The origin of management as quite a new discipline can be traced back in the 20th century. The management courses developed from the accounting and book-keeping courses were introduced in the US as the country lost its frontier image and began to industrialize. It was modeled on the standard American two-year postgraduate academic programme and most students enrolled in right after taking their first degree. This model won rapid acceptance and spread quickly.
In 1908, the Graduate School of Business Administration (GSBA) at Harvard University was established; it offered the world’s first MBA program. The lead was then followed by the University Of Chicago Booth School Of Business, Thunderbird School of Global Management and so on. But a report in 1959 by Carnegie Foundation shook their foundation by stating that business education has changed little since its inception in 1931 and added that the business schools have failed to identify and establish a genuine discipline characterized by its own body of subject matter, theoretical problems and research methodology.
Subsequent to this report, there were attempt to review the management education. As a result, professional accrediting association of business and management education, American Assembly of Collegiate Schools of Business looked into the concerns. Management education thereafter showed continuous improvement and grew rapidly.
Business schools responded rapidly, raising both their admissions and teaching standards and establishing the now well-known American emphasis on academic research. The overall effect was the creation of the classic American MBA model: a first year of required core courses to provide grounding in the basics of management and a second year of electives to allow specialization or deeper study.
But Again in 1980’s American higher education of business was condemned for being ill-equipped to develop appropriate policies and creative consensus based organizations. Thus in year 1982, Association to Advance Collegiate Schools of Business (AACSB) and European Foundation for Management Development (EFMD) came up with a study that recommended that:
• Management Schools should provide an education that combines both generalist and specialist components
• Management Education should be more holistic in character. It needs to be more integrated-incorporating functional, quantitative and analytical fields including the humanities and sciences-to educate the “whole” manager to meet the responsibilities and challenges of the future.
•Management education should aim to develop future managers with portfolio of capabilities.
•Management education should teach more effective environmental scanning and analysis which is particularly important for domestic and international business.
•Management courses should strive to develop experiential courses in creativity and managerial innovation.
Such global challenges exerted pressure on management schools to change.
At the same time, interest in management education was growing in Europe, especially in UK, which was looking for an antidote to its economic and industrial decline relative to its major world-trading partners. The business schools of UK emphasized on importance of trainings and even regarded it as a strategic weapon. Thus management education and management practices started converging. It was clear that management development needed to create a portfolio of learning through use of varied pedagogical approaches.
The history of management education in India, dates back to 1960’s when the foundations of the first Indian Institute of Management (IIM) were laid. With the changing dynamics of the business environment, indigenous industry realized the need for employees having formal education packaged with experience of real life case studies.
Thus on a whole, business schools are bringing together various bundles of experiences, situations and contexts including cultural sensitivities to bring managerial education closer to the practice of management.